Deficiency in service — person — includes company : Consumer Protection Act S. 2(1)(m).

[ Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
v. Ashok Iron Works P. Ltd. with Ors., AIR 2009 SC 1905]

The definition of term person was never intended to exclude
a juristic person like company. The definition u/s.2(1)(m) is inclusive and
not exhaustive.

The Court held that non supply of electricity to consumer
by transmission company within time agreed upon even if the consumer is a
manufacturing unit, amounts to deficiency in service as per the definition of
consumer as it stood before 2002 Amendment. Therefore the complaint against
transmission company is maintainable before Consumer Forum.

The Court further observed that u/s.2(1)(o) ‘service’ means
service of any description which is made available to potential users and
includes the provision of facilities in connection with supply of electrical
or other energy. ‘Deficiency’ u/s.2(1)(g) means any fault, imperfection,
shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance
which is required to be maintained by or under any law for the time being in
force or has been undertaken to be performed by a person in pursuance of a
contract or otherwise in relation to any service. As indicated in the
definition of ‘service’, the provision of facilities in connection with supply
of electrical energy is a service. Supply of electricity by the Board or for
that matter KPTC to a consumer would be covered u/s.2(1)(o) being ‘service’
and if the supply of electrical energy to a consumer is not provided in time
as is agreed upon, then u/s.2(1)(g), there may be a case for deficiency in
service.