Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
21 Dishonour of cheque : Only the drawer of cheque can be
held liable for the offence : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S. 138, S. 141.
Where the wife was joint account holder alongwith her husband
and cheque was issued by husband, which was dishonoured, the wife cannot be held
liable for the offence u/s.141 of the Act.
The Court observed that there is no such provision regarding
taking cognisance against a person other than the ‘drawer’ of the cheque. It is
manifest from the expression of the words used in S. 138 of the Act “such person
shall be deemed to have committed the offence” related to the person who has
drawn the cheque in favour of the payee and if the said cheque is returned
unpaid on account of the conditions mentioned u/s.138 of the Act, such person
alone is liable, but not other except the contingencies mentioned u/s.141 of the
Act. The accused husband could alone be saddled with culpable liability as he
was the only ‘drawer’ of the cheque.
[ Smt. Bandeep Kaur v. S. Avneet Singh, AIR 2008 (NOC)
1301 (P&H)]