Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
37 Capital gains : Exemption u/s.54B of
Income-tax Act, 1961 : B. P. 1-4-1988 to 15-7-1998 : Sale of agricultural land
and out of sale proceeds, purchase of agricultural land in his name and in the
name of his only son : Exemption u/s.54B allowable.
[CIT v. Gurnam Singh, 170 Taxman 160 (P&H)]
In the relevant period, the assessee had sold agricultural
land and out of the sale proceeds, the assessee, along with his son, had
purchased another agricultural land and claimed deduction u/s.54B of the
Income-tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim on the ground
that exemption from capital gains was available only in case the sale proceed
was invested by the assessee for purchasing another agricultural land and not in
respect of the land purchased by any other person. The Tribunal allowed the
assessee’s claim.
On appeal by the Revenue, the Punjab and Haryana High Court
upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under :
“Undisputedly, the assessee had sold the agricultural land
which was being used by him for agricultural purposes. Out of its sale
proceeds, the assessee had purchased another piece of land in his name and in
the name of his only son, who was a bachelor and was dependent upon him, for
being used for agricultural purposes within the stipulated time. Undisputedly,
the purchased land was being used by the assessee only for agricultural
purposes and merely because in the sale deed his only son was also shown as
co-owner, it did not make any difference, because the purchased land was still
being used by the assessee for agricultural purposes. It was not the case of
the Revenue that the said land was being used exclusively by his son.”