Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
Reported :
16. Business expenditure :
S. 37(1) of Income-tax Act, 1961 : A.Y. 2004-05 : Assessee a cine artist :
Expenditure relating to fans association is deductible business expenditure.
[CIT v. A. Vijayakant,
234 CTR 103 (Mad.)]
The assessee is a popular
cine actor. For the A.Y. 2004-05, the assessee had claimed a deduction of
Rs.20,19,000 towards Rasigar Manrams (fans associations) expenses. The Assessing
Officer rejected the claim. The CIT(A) noticed that for the A.Ys. 2001-02 to
2003-04, 80% of the claim was allowed. The CIT(A) therefore restricted the
disallowance to 20%. The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(A).
On appeal by the Revenue,
the Madras High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under :
“(i) It is a well-known
fact that popular cine artists promote their Rasigar Manrams for the purpose
of promoting their films among the public at large. For that purpose when it
is claimed that substantial amount was spent towards dress, food, etc., at the
time of release of new films as well as for regular maintenance of the Rasigar
Manram activities, it cannot be held that it was not part of their
professional activities, namely, acting in cine field.(ii) Therefore, the
perception of the CIT(A), which found favour with the Tribunal, cannot be
faulted.(iii) The appeal fails and
the same is dismissed.”