Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
Reported :
45 Revision : S. 263 of Income-tax Act, 1961 : A.Y. 2004-05 :
Commissioner setting aside assessment order and directing AO to pass fresh order
following procedure u/s. 50C(2)(b) : Not proper : Commissioner has no power to
direct AO to complete asessment in a particular manner.
[CIT v. Smt. Tasneem Z. Madraswala; 324 ITR 67 (Mad.)]
For the A.Y. 2004-05, the assessment was completed u/s.143(3)
of the Income-tax Act, 1961 determining the total income at Rs.8,02,440.
Subsequently, the Commissioner set aside the assessment order exercising the
powers u/s.263 of the Act and also directed the Assessing Officer to pass a
fresh assessment order following the procedure contemplated u/s.50C(2)(b) of the
Act. The Tribunal deleted the direction given by the Commissioner for invoking
the procedure contemplated u/s.50C(2)(b) of the Act to value the capital asset
in a particular manner.
The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the
Revenue and held as under :
“While cancelling the order of assessment, there was no power
vested with the Commissioner to direct the Assessing Officer to complete the
assessment in a particular manner. Therefore, the Tribunal had correctly set
aside that portion of the order passed by the Commissioner, directing the
Assessing Officer to complete the assessment by recourse to the provisions
contained u/s.50C(2)(b) of the Act.”