Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
Substantial questions of law —
Whether the freight paid by the assessee (AOP) to truck owners who in turn are
members of the said AOP is subject to TDS u/s.194C(2) of the Act, is a
substantial question of law.
[CIT v. Sirmour Truck
Operators Union (No. 1), (2009) 313 ITR 26 (SC)][CIT v. Sirmour Truck
Operators Union (No. 2), (2009) 313 ITR 27 (SC)]M/s. Gujarat Ambuja Cements
Ltd. entered into a contract with M/s. Sirmour Trucks Operators Union, a
society, consisting of truck operators as its members. The question which
arose before the High Court was whether the freight paid by the assessee (AOP)
to truck owners, who in turn are members of the said AOP, is subject to TDS
u/s.194C(2) of the Act. According to the Supreme Court, the afore-stated
question was a substantial question of law and the High Court ought to have
decided the said question and ought not to have dismissed the appeals
summarily. The Supreme Court therefore remitted the matter to the High Court
for consideration in accordance with the law.