Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
13 Penalty : Concealment of income : S.
271(1)(c) of Income-tax Act, 1961 : Cash compensatory support not included in
original return : Amount included in revised return: No concealment of income:
Penalty could not be imposed.
[CIT v. Mentha and Allied Products P. Ltd., 304 ITR
214 (All.)]
In the original return of income the assessee had not
included the cash compensatory support amounting to Rs.65,61,640. Subsequently,
the Finance Act, 1990, brought about an amendment, with retrospective effect,
that the cash assistance was taxable. In view of this amendment, the assessee
voluntarily filed a revised return and included the cash compensatory support
therein. The Assessing Officer levied penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Income-tax
Act, 1961. The Tribunal cancelled the penalty. In appeal before the High Court,
the Revenue contended that the Tribunal had cancelled the penalty wrongly on the
basis that the assessee has voluntarily filed the revised return when in fact
the revised return was filed after issuance of notice u/s.142(1) on 30-1-1991.
The Allahabad High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the
Revenue and upheld the decision of the Tribunal.