75th Founding Day Lecture Meeting on “India@2030” Know More

May 2012

Appellant claimed CENVAT credit — Based on delivery notes — Revenue’s contention — Delivery notes cannot be considered as valid documents for availment — Held, credit cannot be denied — Delivery notes valid for availment of credit.

By Puloma Dalal
Jayesh Gogri
Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
(2012) 25 STR 428 (Kar.) — CCE, Bangalore v. Saturn Industries.

Appellant claimed CENVAT credit — Based on de-livery notes — Revenue’s contention — Delivery notes cannot be considered as valid documents for availment — Held, credit cannot be denied — Delivery notes valid for availment of credit.


Facts:

The appellant claimed CENVAT/Modvat of the duty paid on the basis of the delivery notes. The Revenue in its appeal against the Tribunal’s order, contended that delivery notes cannot be considered as valid legal document for availment of the credit.

Held:

It was held that the benefit cannot be denied on the grounds of non-compliance with procedures when sufficient evidence about the duty payment on inputs was available on records.

Download PDF

You May Also Like

2013 (31) STR 279 (P&H) Commissioner of Central Excise, Ludhiana vs. City Cables

Reassessment: Limitation: Exclusion from limitation: S/s. 147, 148, 149 and 150: A.Ys. 1999-00 to 2002-03: Reassessment pursuant to order of appellate authority in case of third party: Condition precedent for exclusion of limitation: Assessee must be given opportunity to be heard: Order of Tribunal in case of third party holding that interest income belonged to assessee: Notice for reassessment beyond six years to assessee without giving opportunity to be heard: Notice barred by time: