75th Founding Day Lecture Meeting on “India@2030” Know More

January 2012

(2011) 24 STR 422 (Tri.-Chennai ) — Agsar Paints Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai.

By Puloma Dalal, Jayesh Gogri
Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
Cenvat — Input credit disallowed — Penalty of Rs.10,000 imposed under Rule 15 of CENVAT Credit Rules Act, 2004 — However, service tax paid on telephone service used for sale promotion is an eligible input service.

Facts
The Commissioner of Central Excise disallowed the total credit of Rs.21,360 of service tax paid on (i) telephone services (ii) vehicle maintenance (iii) fixed telephones, and (iv) courier agency and also upheld a penalty of Rs.10,000.

An appeal was filed only against the denial of credit of service tax paid on the telephone services as the same was eligible input service since used in connection with the activity of business of manufacture of final products.

Held
It was held that credit of service tax paid on the telephone services which is eligible input service since used in connection with the activity of business of manufacture of final products was admissible. The duty demand and the penalty to be requantified in light of the extended credit of service tax in respect of tax paid on telephone service.

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Ss. 40 (a) (i) 195, Article 12 of Indo US DTAA On facts, marketing, quality assurance, e-publishing and turnkey services provided by American company to Indian company did not ‘make available’ knowledge, etc. Hence, payment was not Fees for Included Services (FIS)

S. 9 and Article 5 & 7, India-Italy DTAA : Supply of machinery and raw material to WOS, no PE