Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
II. Tribunal :
1. Construction of Residential Complex Service :
Findings of adjudicating authority not challenged by the
applicant.
Mokha Builders and Promoters v. CCE, Bhopal (2008 TIOL
547 CESTAT DEL)
â The appellant, a
builder, paid service tax under Construction of Complex Service and filed a
refund application on the ground of non-taxability of service. Refund claim was
rejected by the lower authority as well as by the Appellate authority. Appellant
contended that they being builders were not liable for service tax and unjust
enrichment did not arise as they did not collect service tax. However, they did
not challenge the findings of the adjudicating authority that agreement for sale
of flat was entered into prior to construction of flat and the appellant
constructed the flat. The Tribunal rejected the appeal on the ground that
findings of the adjudicating authority was not challenged by the applicant.
Further, on issue of unjust-enrichment, the appellant’s
contention that service tax was not collected from purchasers of flat was proved
false, as sale deed with customer mentioned that service tax would be paid by
the purchasers of flat.