Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
Facts:
The appellant was a company incorporated in Mauritius (‘MCo’). Mauritius tax authority had issued Tax Residence Certificate (‘TRC’) to MCo. MCo held equity shares of an Indian company. MCo sold the shares to another Mauritius company resulting in capital gains.
MCo sought ruling of AAR on the following questions:
Whether MCo was liable to tax on capital gain under Income-tax Act and India-Mauritius DTAA?
Whether the sale of shares was subject to withholding tax u/s. 195 of Income-tax Act?
MCo contended that in terms of Article 13(4) of India-Mauritius DTAA, capital gain arising from sale of shares was not liable to tax in India and that TRC constituted valid and sufficient evidence of residential status under India-Mauritius DTAA. MCo also relied on Supreme Court’s decision in Union of India v. Azadi Bachao Andolan, (2003) 263 ITR 706 (SC) and Circular No. 789 of 2000 of CBDT.
Held:
In terms of Article 13(4) of India-Mauritius DTAA, power of taxation of gains is vested only in the state of residence (i.e., in this case, Mauritius). If the provision in DTAA is more beneficial, the taxpayer is entitled to seek benefit under DTAA. Hence, MCo was not liable to pay tax in India on capital gains.
Sale of share is not subject to withholding tax u/s. 195 of T I Act.