Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
The Tribunal held that DEPB is a profit derived from export business for the purposes of deduction u/s.10BA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In appeal by the Revenue, the following question was raised:
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in law in holding DEPB as a profit derived from export business for the purpose of deduction u/s.10BA ignoring the ratio of decision in the case of Liberty India v. CIT, (2009) 225 CTR (SC) 233; (2009) 28 DTR (SC) 73; (2009) 317 ITR 218 (SC) having binding force on facts and circumstances of the case?”
The Bombay High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:
“The Counsel for the Revenue fairly states that though the question has been raised by relying upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Liberty India v. CIT, the said decision has no relevance to the facts of the present case. In this view of the matter, the question raised by the Revenue cannot be entertained.”