Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
Facts:
Original authority passed the order-in-original without offering personal hearing opportunity to the assessee. After observing the principle of natural justice, the Commissioner (Appeals) annulled the order and directed the lower authority to adjudicate afresh. The Department filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that the Commissioner (Appeals) had no power to remand.
Held:
Section 35A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 has not been made applicable to service tax matters u/s. 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. Section 85(4) does not preclude the Commissioner (Appeals) from passing a remand order if he thinks fit. Hence held that since the principle of natural justice was not followed and considering the amount of demand, the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) remanding the case was upheld and appeal of the Department was rejected.
Comment:
The above two judgments are contradictory.