Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
The assessee was engaged in procuring different parts and assembling wind mills. For the A.Y. 2005- 06, the Assessing Officer disallowed the assessee’s claim for deduction u/s.80-IB holding that the activity of assembling the parts of the wind mill does not amount to ‘manufacture’ or ‘production’ of any article or thing. The Tribunal allowed the assessee’s claim.
On appeal by the Revenue, the Madras High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under: “
(i) The different parts procured by the assessee by themselves cannot be treated as a windmill. Those different parts bear distinctive names and when assembled together, it gets transformed into an ultimate product which is commercially known as ‘windmill’.
(ii) There can, therefore, be no difficulty in holding that such an activity carried on by the assessee would amount to ‘manufacture’ as well as ‘production’ of a thing or article as set out u/s.80-IB(2)(iii). (iii) In such circumstances, the conclusion of the Tribunal in accepting the plea of the assessee cannot be found fault with.”