75th Founding Day Lecture Meeting on “India@2030” Know More

March 2015

company- Section 179- A. Y. 2003-04- Recovery proceedings on the ground of non-filing of the returns by company- Order u/s. 179 is not valid-

By K. B. Bhujle Advocate
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
Ram Prakash Singeshwar Rungta vs. ITO; 370 ITR 641 (Guj):

The Assessing Officer passed order u/s. 179 against the directors for recovery of the tax dues of the private company. The Gujarat High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the said order and held as under:

“The sole ground on the basis of which the order u/s. 179 had been passed was that the directors were responsible for the non-filing of returns of income and that the demand had been raised due to the inaction on the part of the directors. Clearly, therefore, the entire focus and discussion of the ITO in the order was in respect of the directors’ neglect in the functioning of the company when the company was functional. On a plain reading of the order, it was apparent that nothing had been stated therein regarding any gross negligence, misfeasance or breach of duty on the part of the directors due to which the tax dues of the company could not be recovered. The order u/s. 179 was not valid.”

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Business expenditure – Section 37 – A. Y. 2005- 06- Premium on keyman insurance on partners paid by firm – Premium is deductible

Educational institution- Exemption u/s. 11- A.Y. 2007-08- Capital expenditure incurred for attainment of object of institution is application of income- Assessee is entitled to exemption u/s. 11-