Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
The Respondents purchased the property in an auction, which was held by this Court, after paper publication on 08-03-2012. The said sale was confirmed by this Court and the Court directed the Official Liquidator to execute a sale deed in favour of the Respondents after receiving entire sale consideration.
The Respondents contended that it was not open to the appellants to take a stand that since the guideline value of the properties were increased only in the month of April 2012 and therefore, the Respondents are liable to pay the amount on that basis.
The Respondents vehemently submitted that the law is a well settled in regard to the purchase of property in a Court Auction and the authorities cannot refer the document demanding higher stamp duty unless a fraudulent attempt on the part of parties to document to evade payment of stamp duty is manifest.
When the Respondents had purchased the properties in question by way of sale deeds executed by the official liquidator for the sale value mentioned in the sale deeds, the said value cannot be questioned by appellants at a later point of time merely on the premise that the sale value mentioned in the sale deeds purchased by the respondents cannot be termed as `market value’.
The court observed that section 47A has no application whatsoever, in sofar as the respondents, purchasers of properties in company court auction because of the prime reason that there is no room for entertaining any doubt that there was any under valuation in regard to the sale deeds executed by the official liquidator.