Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
Assessee
sold a property for a consideration of Rs. 3,46,50,000/- and invested
Rs. 1 crore out of the sale proceeds in capital gains bonds in two
financial years 2007-08 and 2008-09 Rs. 50 lakh each within the
prescribed time limit of six months. For the A. Y. 2008- 09 the
Assessing Officer held that the assessee could take the benefit of
investment in specified bonds upto a maximum of Rs. 50 lakh only u/s.
54EC(1) of the Incometax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the exemption
granted under the proviso to section 54EC(1) should be construed not
transaction-wise but financial year-wise. If an assessee was able to
invest a sum of Rs. 50 lakh each in two different financial years,
within the period of six months from the dated of transfer of the
capital asset, it could not be said to be inadmissible. Accordingly, the
Tribunal allowed the assessee’s claim.
On appeal by the Revenue, the Madras High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:
“The
assessee was entitled to exemption of Rs. 1 crore u/s. 54EC, in respect
of investment of Rs. 50 lakh each made in two different financial
years”