Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
CENVAT credit is denied on the ground that the service provider had taken registration subsequent to availment of CENVAT credit by service receiver.Therefore, the CENVAT credit would not be available to service receiver. Accordingly, CENVAT credit of trivial amount was denied in absence of registration number on invoices.
Held
If the assessee has paid service tax to service provider, CENVAT credit is available to service receiver without finding whether service tax paid by him to service provider stands deposited in the Government treasury. Verification of the fact of payment of service tax by service provider is impossible and impractical at service receiver’s end. Even if the revenue is of the view that service tax collected by service provider is not deposited by him, remedy is available with the department to take appropriate action against service provider and not service receiver. In the present case, the revenue did not even verify the fact of non-payment by service provider. Therefore, it was held that the appellant had rightly availed CENVAT credit.