75th Founding Day Lecture Meeting on “India@2030” Know More

December 2015

Service tax is not leviable on marketing of mutual funds and bonds. The decision by Andhra Pradesh High Court has set aside CBEC circular dated 05/11/2003 clarifying that these services are Business Auxiliary Services.

By Puloma Dalal
Jayesh Gogri
Mandar Telang, Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
38. 2015 (40) STR 187(Tri-Del.) Comm. of Service Tax Delhi vs. ABN Amro Bank.

Service tax is not leviable on marketing of mutual funds and bonds. The decision by Andhra Pradesh High Court has set aside CBEC circular dated 05/11/2003 clarifying that these services are Business Auxiliary Services.

Facts

The appellant was engaged in business of marketing mutual fund units and were also selling bonds issued by banking and non-banking companies. The first appellate authority on the basis of the Andhra Pradesh High Court judgement in case of Karvy Securities vs. Union of India 2006 (2) STR 481 granted relief. Revenue challenged the decision before the Tribunal citing the CBEC circular dated 05/11/2003 providing that the said activity is taxable.

Held

The Tribunal upheld the order and held that services are not taxable as CBEC circular dated 05/11/2013 was struck down by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Karvy Securities (supra).

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Recovery u/s. 87 of the Finance Act, 1994 can be resorted to only after an amount is adjudicated to be due to the Central Government.

Intention of Rule 6(1A) of STR is to grant adjustment of excess service tax paid in advance towards forthcoming tax liability. Non furnishing of intimation for advance payment is merely a procedural lapse and denial of adjustment on this ground is not justified.