75th Founding Day Lecture Meeting on “India@2030” Know More

January 2014

2013 (32) STR 474 (Tri-Mumbai) Golden Tobacco Ltd vs. CCEx, Mumbai – V

By Puloma Dalal, Jayesh Gogri, Mandar Telang Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
Whether Mobile/Telephone service installed at the residence of the Directors eligible for credit?

Facts:
Appellant preferred the appeal against order of Revenue denying the service tax credit on mobile/ telephone installed at the residence of the Directors of the Appellant on the reasoning that the same did not qualify as input service definition.

Held:
Tribunal referring to the decision of the Bombay High Court in Ultratech Cement Ltd.-2010 (260) ELT 369 (Bom.) which held that services used by the manufacturer of excisable goods in the course of its business activity would be entitled for credit, allowed the appeal of the Appellant.

Download PDF

You May Also Like

2013 (32) STR 525 (Tri-Chennai) Central Bank of India vs. Comm. of Ex & ST, Chennai.

2013 TIOL 1734 CESTAT – Kol, UCO Bank vs. CST, Kolkata