75th Founding Day Lecture Meeting on “India@2030” Know More

August 2013

2013 (30) S.T.R. 593 (Tri.–Kolkata) Suchak Marketing Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata.

By Puloma Dalal, Jayesh Gogri, Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
No late fee for delay in filing ‘Nil’ Returns – Board Circular No.97/8/2007 – ST dtd.23-08-2007 relied upon. Facts:
The Appellant provided commercial or industrial construction service and got registered under the said category. They filed ‘NIL’ Returns for the period September 2005 – March 2008 on 18-11-2008. Consequently, penalty under Rule 7C of the Service Tax Rules was confirmed and the Appellant was directed to pay Rs. 12,000/- for each Return and further imposed penalty of Rs.2,000/- u/s. 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner (Appeals) dropped the penalty u/s. 77 but confirmed the penalty of Rs. 12,000/- against the Appellant under Rule 7C of the Rules. The Revenue contended that since the penalty u/s. 77 was already dropped, there was no reason to waive the late fees under the said Rule 7C.

Held:
Relying on Board Circular No. 97/8/2007 ST dated 23/08/2007 clarifying that, in absence of any service rendered, there is no requirement to file ST-3 Returns. Further invoking proviso to the said Rule 7C, the late fees for the NIL Returns were waived.
Download PDF

You May Also Like

2013 (30) S.T.R. 673 (Tri.-MUM) CCE, Mumbai – V vs. GTC Industries Ltd.

2013 (30) S.T.R. 634 (Tri.-Delhi) G.R. Movers vs. CCE, Lucknow.