75th Founding Day Lecture Meeting on “India@2030” Know More

May 2014

[2014] 43 taxmann.com 172 (Mumbai – CESTAT) – Hiranandani Constructions (P.) Ltd vs. CCE

By Puloma Dalal, Jayesh Gogri, Mandar Telang Chartered Accountants
Reading Time 2 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
Stay – Whether charges collected by the Promoter developer from flat buyers in terms of provisions of Section 5 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation) Act, 1963 are liable to service tax under ‘Management, maintenance and repair services’ – Held, prima facie – No.

The appellant was engaged in the construction of residential complex and collected certain amounts as the development and maintenance fees from the flat buyers before handing over to them possession of the flats. Such sum was collected by it as a promoter to discharge payments towards outgoing expenses including any municipal local taxes, property tax, water charges, electric charges, revenue assessment or interest or any mandatory charges under the provisions of section 5 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation) Act, 1963. The Appellant was under obligation to return the balance amount, if any, after debiting the expenses, while handing over the possession. The department considered the a ctivity as taxable under the category of “management, maintenance and repair services”. The Tribunal after perusing the provisions of section 5 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats (Regulation) Act, 1963, held that the Appellant has made out a strong case in their favour and accordingly unconditional waiver and stay for recovery was granted.

Download PDF

You May Also Like

[2014] 43 taxmann.com 41 (Mumbai – CESTAT) – Maharashtra State Co-op. Bank Ltd vs. CCE

M/S. IFB Industries Ltd. vs. State of Kerala, [2012] 49 VST SC 1.