75th Founding Day Lecture Meeting on “India@2030” Know More

June 2012

Assessment: Change of status: Validity: A.Y. 1972-73: If the status of the assessee is required to be modified, the only option is to assess the income in the appropriate status, if permitted by law: CIT(A) modifying the status of assessee: Not valid.

By K. B. Bhujle, Advocate
Reading Time 1 mins
fiogf49gjkf0d
[Gutta Anjaneyulu v. CIT, 249 CTR 106 (AP)]

For the A.Y. 1972-73, assessment was made in the status of AOP consisting of 3 persons.

 In appeal, the CIT(A) modified the status from AOP to BOI comprising 2 persons. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A). On appeal by the assessee, the Andhra Pradesh High Court reversed the decision of the Tribunal and held as under:

“If the status of the assessee is required to be modified, the only option available to the ITO is to assess the income in the appropriate status, if permitted by law, by issuing a notice to the assessee in that particular status. The CIT(A) was not justified in modifying the status from AOP to BOI.”

Download PDF

You May Also Like

Appeal to CIT(A): Additional ground: A.Y. 2001-02: Claim for benefit of proviso to section 112(1) not made in the return: Could be accepted by CIT(A): Assessee is entitled to raise the legal issue before the first Appellate Authority, which possessed co-terminus powers similar to the AO.

Business expenditure: Bad debts: Section 36(1)(vii) and 36(2) of Income-tax Act, 1961: A.Y. 1998-99: Assessee share-broker: Nonrecovery of amount receivable from clients against purchase of shares: Non-recoverable amount is bad debt deductible u/s.36(1)(vii) r.w.s 36(2).