Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
Facts:
Wrong classification was made by department which the assessee did not challenge. The department issued Show Cause Notice demanding tax under wrong classification. The assessee contested such classification in the reply to the Show Cause Notice. The Commissioner (Appeals) held in favour of assessee. The revenue’s contention revolved only around non-challenge at the time of approval by the Assistant Commissioner.
Held:
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal stating that, only because the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner classified and approved some goods under wrong heading without any challenge by the assessee, it would not mean that for future also, wrong classification shall continue in respect of such goods. Also, on the receipt of demand of duty vide Show Cause Notice, the assessee challenged the erroneous classification. Therefore, it cannot be said that the assessee had accepted the classification and that the approval attained finality.