Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
24 Hindu Law : Daughters are entitled to a share in ancestral
properties as a co-parcener : Hindu Succession Act, 1950, S. 6.
One Shri Jagatram was the common ancestor of the parties. He
was owner in possession of the property. After his death, one Shri Byasadev
succeeded to the suit properties. Shri Byasadev died, leaving behind his widow
defendant No. 1 and two daughters i.e., plaintiff and defendant No. 2 as
his legal heirs, the other defendants are coparceners. While the father of the
plaintiff was alive, she out of her own income constructed the house on the suit
property with consent of her parents.
After the death of Byasadev, the plaintiff demanded for
partition of the suit house claiming exclusive share.
The High Court observed that after the amendment made in S. 6
of the Hindu Succession Act in the year 2005, the daughters are entitled to a
share in the ancestral properties as coparceners. The parties belong to Hindu
Mitakshara family and plaintiff and defendant No. 2 are daughters. Defendant No.
1 is the widow and other defendants are the successors of common ancestor
Jagatram. Since they are coparceners, each of them is entitled to a share. All
the parties in the suit are entitled to a share and that there was no previous
partition.
[ Santilata Sahu v. Sabitri Sahu & Ors., AIR 2008
Orissa 86]