Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
28 Registration : Reconveyance deed not
compulsorily registrable : Registration Act, 1908, S. 17(1)(b).
Whether a non-testamentary document in respect of immovable
properties is compulsorily registrable or not depends on the facts and
circumstances and the terms of the document. No hard and fast rule can be laid
down. The crucial test in each case is as to the nature of the document itself,
if it does create a right, title or interest in itself, whether in present or in
future, it is compulsory registrable u/s.17(1)(b). However, if by itself it does
not create any right but visualises creation or extinction of a right by some
other document, then it falls squarely within the ambit of S. 17(2)(v) and,
hence, not registrable.
In the instant case, the agreement in dispute was a simple
agreement to reconvey property under certain conditions mentioned therein and,
thus, was not compulsorily registrable. Under the circumstances, even provisions
of S. 92(4) of the Evidence Act are not applicable in such case and therefore
subsequent document varying the terms of recoveying deed would not required to
be registered.
[Bhikkilal & Ors v. Smt. Shanti Devi & Ors., AIR
2008 Rajasthan 128]