Stay abreast with the latest developments in the professional domain along with in-depth analysis through the monthly BCA Journal. Get access to an engaging library of researched publications from the BCAS stable.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreA voluntary organisation established on 6th July 1949, BCAS has presently more than 9,000 members from all over the country. BCAS is a principle-centered and learning-oriented organisation promoting quality service and excellence in the profession of Chartered Accountancy.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn MoreLorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book.
Learn More
II. Tribunal :
11. Self-adjustment of excess payment :
M/s. Narnolia Securities P. Ltd. v. CST, Ranchi, (2008
TIOL 538 CESTAT-Kol.]
â The appellant had
paid service tax on behalf of four other service providers and later came to
know that service providers had also paid taxes separately, adjusted the same
against subsequent payment.
The Revenue contended that Rule 6(3) did not permit this.
It was held the appellant’s contention that they were under
genuine belief that such adjustment was permissible under Rule 6(3) as ST-3
returns filed disclosed such adjustments which confirmed the bona fides
of the appellant. The Tribunal stated that the Department has at no stage
advised the appellant to claim a refund for excess payment, instead of making
adjustments on their own and that such adjustments are not permitted by Rule
6(3). Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, a lenient view was
taken.