Tightening the Book-Keeping Requirements: Amendments to the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014
From Published Accounts
Purchase-As-Produced Contracts – Whether Derivative or Not?
BCAS – Volunteering – Making a Difference
BCAS – Volunteering – Making a Difference
Allied Laws
Reporting Under PMLA by Professionals – Deciphering ‘On Behalf Of’
Corporate Law Corner : Part A | Company Law
IBC: Tax or Creditors – Who Wins?
‘Only Source of Income’ For S. 80-IA/80IB and Other Provisions
Glimpses of Supreme Court Rulings
Business expenditure — Accrued or contingent liability — Provision for future expenses based on turnover — Amount set apart to meet future liabilities — Expenses in-built in the contract — Provision not contingent — Allowable deduction
Computation of Capital Gains — Deduction of expenses wholly and exclusively in connection with transfer of capital asset — Transfer of shares – Amount paid for professional advice in accordance with articles of association of company – Deductible
Offences and Prosecution — Wilful failure to file return — S. 276CC requires mens rea — Belated return and payment of tax and interest based on return accepted — Protective assessment set aside — No imposition of penalty — Prosecution not valid
Reassessment — Notice — Res judicata — General principles — Consistency in decision making — Same decision-making authority rendering two decisions inconsistent with each other for different assessment years facts and circumstances being similar — Order and notice set aside
Reassessment — Notice u/s. 148 — Reason to believe that income has escaped assessment — Entity with which assessee had sale transaction not established to be shell entity — No enquiry conducted by AO pursuant to the receipt of information from investigation wing — Non-application of mind on part of AO — Notice and order rejecting assessee’s objections set aside
Reassessment — Notice — Validity — Notice based on information from Deputy Director in respect of investigation of the firm from which two of assessee’s directors retired alleging that assessee had received bogus accommodation entries in form of imports — Investigation report on which reliance placed by Department not provided to the assessee — Notice vague and not clear — Order for the issue of notice and order of reassessment set aside — Matter remanded
Recovery of tax — Stay of recovery proceedings — Discretion of Income-tax authorities — Discretion to be exercised in a judicious manner
Revision u/s. 264 — Powers of Commissioner are not limited to correct an error committed by subordinate authorities but could even be exercised where errors are committed by the assessee — Assessee filed an applicationunder Section 154 and first time claimed indexcost of improvement being renovation expenses which was not claimed in original return of income
Section 148A and 151: Reassessment — Change of opinion — Tangible material — Reasons/ information cannot be substituted or modified
Section 271(1)(c): Penalty — Concealment of income — Full disclosure of facts — No facts concealed or hidden — Penalty cannot be levied for difference in the opinion
Where the assessee sold flats at varied rates and the variation in rate was significant, Revenue directed to apply the weighted average rate of all the units for estimating the value of sales (except for one unit which is incomparable) and thus, to be valued at actual instead of the maximum rate applied by the Revenue to estimate sale value of the flats sold at varied rates by the assessee
The rate of tax mentioned in s. 115BBE does not apply to income surrendered in the course of the search, in a statement made under section 132(4), and the Department has no dispute with regard to the explanation of the assessee regarding the source of the surrendered income
When income is offered for taxation under the head ‘Income from House Property’ but the income is assessed under the head ‘profits and gains of business or profession’ it cannot be said that the assessee has suppressed or under-reported any income. Where the assessee offered an explanation as to why it reported rental income under the head ‘income from house property’ and the explanation of the assessee was not found to be false, the case would be covered by s. 270A(6)(a)
S. 271(1)(c) — Penalty levied without any independent and specific finding being recorded as to how disallowance made by the Assessing Officer (AO) which was upheld by the Tribunal, would lead to a charge of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income by the assessee, was unjustified and to be deleted
S. 69B, 132 – Additions to total income not sustainable when no incriminating material was found during the search. S. 153A, 153C – Additions based on documents found during a search on a third party to be made under section 153C and not 153A of the Act
Article 13(4) of old India-Mauritius DTAA – Having failed to establish that assessee is a conduit, basis TRC issued by tax authorities, the assessee is a tax resident of Mauritius and is entitled to DTAA benefits
Pains of Harsh Penalties for Bonafide Mistakes
From The President
Tax Implications on Assignment of Lease-Hold Rights
Goods and Services Tax
Service Tax
Recent Developments in GST
NRI – Interplay of Tax and FEMA Issues – Residence of Individuals under The Income-Tax Act
विनाशकाले विपरीतबुद्धि: ।
Letter to the Editor
Chaturmas (चतुर्मास): Why God Goes to Sleep
Miscellanea
Regulatory Referencer
Society News
Statistically Speaking
Tribute to Shri P. N. Shah, Past President of the Society